Amazing Face Cleanser
Luxury Gel Cleanser
Pros & cons.
- +Mild, non-stripping surfactant system suitable for most skin types
- +Beautifully designed sensory experience with signature botanical scent
- +Supported by glycerin, panthenol, and allantoin for post-wash comfort
- +Contains a touch of lactic acid for subtle surface refinement
- +Iconic amber glass packaging that feels considered
- +Vegan and Leaping Bunny certified
- +Works well as a second cleanse in a double cleansing routine
- −Significantly overpriced compared to clinically equivalent mild cleansers
- −Fragrance with disclosed allergens rules it out for sensitive users
- −Does not remove heavy or waterproof makeup without a first cleanse
- −No standout active ingredients beyond a soft lactic acid touch
- −Pump mechanism can clog as the bottle empties
The full review.
Aesop is one of the few skincare brands that has managed to convince intelligent, budget-conscious people to pay $39 for a 100ml bottle of face wash, and the Amazing Face Cleanser is the product that does most of that convincing. It sits in the iconic amber glass bottle with the beige Century Gothic label, it smells like a very expensive herb garden, and it lives in bathrooms where everything else is either Aesop or Le Labo. The question isn’t whether this cleanser is good — it is, on its own terms. The question is what exactly you are paying for, and whether that trade is the right one for you specifically.
Let’s separate the two axes. As a cleanser, this is a well-formulated, genuinely mild surfactant-based gel wash. The primary cleansing agents are sodium methyl cocoyl taurate and cocamidopropyl betaine, both categorized among the gentler anionic and amphoteric surfactants respectively, supported by PEG-7 glyceryl cocoate and a small amount of decyl glucoside. Collectively this is a low-irritation system that produces a soft, low-volume lather and rinses without the squeaky-tight feeling that harsher sulfate cleansers leave behind. Glycerin and panthenol cushion the wash, allantoin and aloe calm it further, and a low dose of lactic and citric acid gives the formula a slight refining nudge. If you handed this INCI list to a formulation chemist with the brand hidden, they would describe it as a good, middle-tier mild gel cleanser. Not groundbreaking. Not clinically novel. Just solidly built.
As a sensory object, it’s operating in a completely different category. The fragrance is the hook — a distinctly botanical blend that reads as herbaceous, slightly citrusy, and unmistakably Aesop. Customers who love it describe it as aromatherapy at the sink; customers who don’t describe it as overpowering. Both reactions are legitimate. Aesop uses actual essential oils plus synthetic fragrance components, which is why the ingredient list openly declares linalool, limonene, geraniol, and citronellol — the EU’s required-disclosure fragrance allergens. For most users these show up in trace amounts too small to provoke reactions, but for anyone with reactive skin, rosacea, or a history of fragrance sensitivity, this is a cleanser to avoid regardless of how pleasant it looks on the shelf.
Performance in real use is predictable. Skin feels refreshed rather than stripped, makeup of the light-to-medium variety rinses cleanly, and the post-wash feel is soft enough that skipping moisturizer briefly would not feel like a disaster (though you should still apply it). For heavier makeup or sunscreen, you’ll want to double cleanse, starting with an oil or balm — this cleanser doesn’t have the solvent power of an oil-based first step. Acne-prone, oily, combination, and normal skin types will all find it pleasantly mild. Very dry skin can use it but might prefer Aesop’s own Fabulous Face Cleanser, which is creamier. Genuinely sensitive skin should look elsewhere.
The elephant in the amber glass bottle is the price. $39 for 100ml is a lot of money for a cleanser, and the formula — while well-made — does not contain anything that would justify the cost on purely clinical grounds. A CeraVe Hydrating Cleanser delivers a similar non-stripping wash for around $15. A La Roche-Posay Toleriane Hydrating Cleanser does the same for roughly the same money. Vanicream Gentle Facial Cleanser strips out the fragrance entirely for $10. If skincare value is your only metric, those are the honest comparisons, and they all outperform Aesop on price-to-quality ratio.
But — and this is where the category matters — Aesop is not competing on price-to-quality ratio. It is competing on bathroom aesthetic, on the sensory ritual of washing your face, on the cultural credential of having the amber bottle visible when a friend comes over. These are not trivial or shallow things. People derive real pleasure and real routine consistency from products they enjoy handling, and a cleanser you use every day because you love the experience is more valuable than a cheaper cleanser you forget to reach for. The honest question is whether you specifically get that pleasure here. Many users do. Many don’t, and eventually drift back to the drugstore aisle.
For customers who love the Aesop experience, who use this daily and find the ritual genuinely calming, it’s a reasonable purchase in a context where enjoyment matters. For customers evaluating on pure skincare merit, there are better ways to spend $39 — pair a $15 CeraVe cleanser with a $24 treatment serum and you’ll do more for your skin than this cleanser ever will. Know which camp you’re in before you commit, because both choices can be the right one depending on what you actually want out of the wash step.
Formula
Ingredient analysis.
Full INCI list
Water (Aqua), Glycerin, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate, PEG-7 Glyceryl Cocoate, Decyl Glucoside, Citric Acid, Lactic Acid, Panthenol, Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein, Allantoin, Betaine, Sodium Lactate, Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit Extract, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice, Camellia Sinensis (Green Tea) Leaf Extract, Chamomilla Recutita (Matricaria) Flower Extract, Fragrance (Parfum), Linalool, Limonene, Geraniol, Citronellol, Sodium Benzoate, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin.
Skin match.
The science.
The Science
This formulation focuses on surfactant selection. Sodium methyl cocoyl taurate is a taurate-based anionic surfactant. It is one of the mildest common surfactants and has a lower irritation profile than sulfate alternatives like sodium lauryl sulfate. Standard irritation assays show it is gentler on the skin barrier. Using it as a primary surfactant shows a formulator aims for low irritation. Cocamidopropyl betaine, the amphoteric co-surfactant here, reduces overall irritation and creates the soft lather gel cleansers need.
The lactic acid inclusion is modest. Lactic acid is a well-studied alpha hydroxy acid. Leave-on treatments at 5-10% concentrations show effects on stratum corneum thickness, pigmentation, and hydration. In a cleanser, contact time is under a minute and the product rinses off, so clinical relevance is limited. However, low-dose AHAs can still provide a perceivable refining effect after weeks of consistent use. Pairing it with citric acid helps maintain a skin-compatible pH (most modern mild cleansers target around 5-6, near the skin's natural acidity), though Aesop does not publish a specific pH value for this formula.
The botanical extracts — cucumber, aloe, green tea, chamomile — have small bodies of research supporting mild anti-inflammatory or antioxidant effects. In a rinse-off product at extract-level concentrations, their clinical impact is sensory and brand-signaling rather than pharmacologically meaningful. This is not a criticism of Aesop; it applies to almost every cleanser with botanical extracts. The surfactant system and surrounding humectant supports do the real skincare work.
Dermatologist Perspective
Dermatologists generally rate Aesop's mild cleansers as acceptable for patients with normal, combination, or dry skin who are not fragrance-reactive, but most note the clinical performance does not match the price tag. Board-certified dermatologists often point out that cleansers are the lowest-impact product in a routine and that luxury-tier prices for a wash step offer diminishing returns. For patients with rosacea, eczema, perioral dermatitis, or known fragrance sensitivity, dermatologists typically avoid any cleanser containing perfume, regardless of how gentle the surfactant system is. Dermatologists commonly recommend this product only when a patient is already committed to the brand and wants a version for their skin type, rather than as a first-line suggestion.
Where it fits in your routine.
Wet your face with lukewarm water. Put a small amount (one pump is usually enough) into damp hands, lather, and massage the face gently for 30-60 seconds. Rinse well with water and pat dry. Use twice daily, or as a second cleanse after an oil or balm cleanser to remove heavy makeup or sunscreen. Follow with a toner, serum, and moisturizer. Avoid direct eye contact. If you feel tightness or stinging, use it once daily or patch test on the neck first.
This is where the review gets uncomfortable. At $39 for 100ml, the Amazing Face Cleanser costs roughly three to four times more than clinically equivalent mild gel cleansers like CeraVe Hydrating, La Roche-Posay Toleriane, or Vanicream Gentle — all of which match or exceed this product in ingredient performance. Aesop offers larger 200ml and 500ml refill sizes at a slightly better per-ml cost. The honest value is that you pay for brand, aesthetic, and the sensory ritual, not skincare sophistication. Whether that premium is reasonable depends on how much joy you get from the product. For some users, that joy is real and worth the price. For users evaluating on skincare merit alone, the markup is hard to defend.
Normal, combination, and oily skin types who want a sensory-first cleanser ritual, like the Aesop aesthetic and scent profile, and have the budget for an experience-focused routine. It also works for established Aesop customers building a branded routine for aesthetic consistency.
People with sensitive or reactive skin, rosacea, eczema, or fragrance allergies should avoid this; the disclosed allergens in the perfume create risk. Skip this if you judge skincare by cost-to-efficacy, as cheaper formulas provide equal or better cleansing performance.
Product details.
A clear, light-amber gel that spreads easily and lathers into a soft, low-volume foam.
The Aesop aromatic scent is herbaceous, slightly citrusy, and botanical. It lingers briefly after rinsing.
The iconic amber glass Aesop bottle has a minimalist beige label. It is heavier and more considered than most cleanser packaging, but the pump can clog toward the end.
It lathers into a soft, low-volume foam with a botanical scent. Skin feels refreshed after rinsing, not stripped or tight. The scent is noticeable but fades within a minute.
2-4 months with twice-daily face use, depending on the amount dispensed.
12 months
All Year
The backstory.
Aesop launched in 1987 as a Melbourne-based botanical brand, growing out of founder Dennis Paphitis's hair salon. The Amazing Face Cleanser is one of the brand's longest-standing cleansers and became a cult favorite in the early 2000s when Aesop expanded internationally through minimalist apothecary-style stores.
About Aesop
Legacy Brand (20+ years)Dennis Paphitis founded Aesop in Melbourne in 1987. For nearly four decades, the brand has built a global botanical skincare reputation. Aesop relies on aesthetic consistency, ingredient transparency, and a loyal following instead of clinical trials or dermatologist endorsement.
Common myths.
Expensive cleansers work better than drugstore ones.
Cleansers are usually the least important part of a skincare budget — they stay on your skin for less than a minute. This one is well-made, but mild surfactant systems with the same effect cost $10-15.
Any cleanser containing AHAs replaces a treatment product.
The lactic acid concentration is low and rinses off in seconds. It provides a mild refining effect, but lacks the strength of a dedicated AHA serum or toner.
FAQ.
Does it remove makeup?
It removes light makeup and sunscreen well. For heavy or waterproof makeup, double cleanse by using an oil or balm cleanser before this one.
Is it safe for sensitive skin?
Use caution. The surfactant system is mild, but the formula contains fragrance with known allergens like linalool, limonene, geraniol, and citronellol. Users with rosacea, eczema, or fragrance reactivity should use a fragrance-free cleanser instead.
How does this compare to Aesop's Fabulous or In Two Minds cleansers?
Amazing Face is the brand's most versatile gel. Fabulous is creamier and works better for dry skin. In Two Minds targets oily skin and has a slight astringent feel. Amazing Face is the neutral middle ground for most skin types.
Will the lactic acid exfoliate my skin?
Only slightly. The cleanser stays on your skin for less than a minute and rinses clean, so the lactic acid provides subtle refining instead of true chemical exfoliation. This is not a substitute for a dedicated AHA product.
Is the fragrance natural or synthetic?
Aesop uses botanical essential oils and synthetic aroma components. This is why the INCI list includes both 'fragrance' and the named allergens. People sensitive to natural or synthetic fragrance should avoid it.
How long does one bottle last?
Using the 100ml size twice daily lasts 2-4 months, depending on your dosage. A small amount lathers more than most drugstore cleansers.
---
What the community says.
"Luxurious sensory experience"
"Doesn't leave skin tight"
"Signature Aesop aromatic scent"
"Lasts longer than expected"
"Expensive for a gel cleanser"
"Fragrance bothers some users"
"Doesn't remove heavy makeup alone"
"Smaller than expected bottle"
People also looked at.